Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: Intel Cherryview/Braswell support

[Timur Tabi]

On 11/04/2014 05:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, first of all, you won't use phandles with ACPI.:-)

Yes, which makes things complicated for me.  The pinctrl binding makes 
heavy use of phandles, so it will be a challenge to come up with a 
substitue.

> That seems to be the case in which some ACPI-specific code would need to be
> written.  In ACPI, instead of the list of phandles you'll have a list of
> references to device objects that you can walk in an analogous way.

Can you point me to an example Linux driver that parses references?

>  I'm
> not sure how much of that code can be shared between DT and ACPI ATM, but
> it looks like at least some of it can be shared.

So ACPI does not support the concept if variable length properties?

> And it looks like we'll need a device_property_read_string_index().:-)

Multi-string properties are also very popular in device tree.

> BTW, where's the pinctrl binding documented?

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/