[PATCH 00/10] Create separate header for ehci-dbgp driver

[Chris Rorvick]

The FUSBH200 and FOTG210 are not EHCI-compatible and require standalone
drivers.  See discussion at:

  http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/84169

But these controllers do implement an EHCI-compatible debug port and
therefore leverage the ehci-dbgp driver.  Rather than pulling in the
necessary declarations from <linux/usb/ehci_def.h>, each driver copies
this code into their own header.  The goal of this series is to pull the
ehci-dbgp related code into its own header to remove the need for this
redundancy.

Regards,

Chris Rorvick

Chris Rorvick (10):
  usb: Create separate header for ehci-dbgp
  fusbh200: Make Xen notification consistent with EHCI
  fusbh200: Remove superfluous macro definitions
  fusbh200: Remove duplicate ehci-dbgp declarations
  fusbh200: Use ehci_dbg_port struct
  fotg210: Make Xen notification consistent with EHCI
  fotg210: Remove superfluous macro definitions
  fotg210: Remove duplicate ehci-dbgp declarations
  fotg210: Use ehci_dbg_port struct
  usb: Remove __init from early_dbgp_init() prototype

 drivers/usb/host/fotg210.h    | 62 ++------------------------------
 drivers/usb/host/fusbh200.h   | 62 ++------------------------------
 include/linux/usb/ehci-dbgp.h | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/usb/ehci_def.h  | 65 ++-------------------------------
 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/usb/ehci-dbgp.h

-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/