Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/12 v3] seq-buf: Make seq_buf_bprintf() conditional on CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF

[Petr Mladek]

On Tue 2014-11-04 10:52:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The function bstr_printf() from lib/vsprnintf.c is only available if
> CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF is defined. This is due to the only user currently
> being the tracing infrastructure, which needs to select this config
> when tracing is configured. Until there is another user of the binary
> printf formats, this will continue to be the case.
> 
> Since seq_buf.c is now lives in lib/ and is compiled even without
> tracing, it must encompass its use of bstr_printf() which is used
> by seq_buf_printf(). This too is only used by the tracing infrastructure
> and is still encapsulated by the CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Please switch the order and do this change before moving to lib/.
IMHO, the current order would break bisecting when tracing is
disabled.

Otherwise, the change looks good in itself, so:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxx>

Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/