Re: [PATCH] PCI: Do not enable async suspend for JMicron chips
From: Barto
Date: Thu Nov 06 2014 - 00:30:05 EST
Hello Bjorn,
in my bugreport I have already tried to add the JMicron 368 in the "if
statement" and it didn't work, check my message here :
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84861#c11
if Chuansheng has choosen a more generic way ( applying the patch to all
JMicron devices ) it's because also because we don't know how many
JMBxxx models could be affected by this bug, tomorrow maybe one user
would create a bug report about a "JMB369" pci card who have again this
bug, and maybe on month later another user with a "JMB382", it could be
a nightmare for Chuanseng if he had to create every time a new patch for
each model of JMicron,
so for the moment the better approach for me is to disable async_suspend
for all JMBxxx JMicron, Chuanseng's patch seems reasonnable, as long as
we don't know the exact list of JMBxxx models we can assume that all
JMicron SATA/IDE are affected by this problem
Le 06/11/2014 05:08, Bjorn Helgaas a Ãcrit :
>
> But you haven't addressed my concerns about (1) putting a PCI vendor
> ID check in the generic PCI core code, and (2) applying this to *all*
> JMicron devices. You might want to explore a quirk-type solution or
> maybe just add the JMicron 368 to the checks added by e6b7e41cdd8c.
>
> Bjorn
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/