Re: Cache Allocation Technology Design

[Matt Fleming]

On Tue, 04 Nov, at 02:17:14PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> I don't like extending cpusets further. Its already a weird and too big
> controller.
> 
> What is wrong with having a specific CQM controller and using it
> together with cpusets where desired?

The specific problem that conflating cpusets and the CAT controller is
trying to solve is that on some platforms the CLOS ID doesn't move with
data that travels up the cache hierarchy, i.e. we lose the CLOS ID when
data moves from LLC to L2.

I think the idea with pinning CLOS IDs to a specific cpu and any tasks
that are using that ID is that it works around this problem out of the
box, rather than requiring sysadmins to configure things.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/