Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kernel Live Patching

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:51:57PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> I don't think this specific example was generated. 
> 
> I also don't think including the whole kpatch automation into the kernel
> tree is a viable development model for it. (Same would apply for kGraft
> automation.)

Why?  We (IMHO incorrectly) used the argument of tight coupling to put
perf into the kernel tree.  Generating kernel live patches is way more
integrated that it absolutely has to go into the tree to be able to do
proper development on it in an integrated fashion.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/