Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] fs: add a flag for per-operation O_DSYNC semantics

[Jeff Moyer]

Milosz Tanski <milosz@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> -		if (type == READ && (flags & RWF_NONBLOCK))
> -			return -EAGAIN;
> +		if (type == READ) {
> +			if (flags & RWF_NONBLOCK)
> +				return -EAGAIN;
> +		} else {
> +			if (flags & RWF_DSYNC)
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +		}

Minor nit, but I'd rather read something that looks like this:

	if (type == READ && (flags & RWF_NONBLOCK))
		return -EAGAIN;
	else if (type == WRITE && (flags & RWF_DSYNC))
		return -EINVAL;

I won't lose sleep over it, though.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/