Re: [PATCH] clocksource: tegra: Port tegra20 clocksource to arm64
From: Anatol Pomozov
Date: Thu Nov 06 2014 - 23:26:26 EST
Hi
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/06/2014 05:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> register_persistent_clock() are in different headers in arm/arm64
>>
>> Tested: Compiled the driver on 64bit platform and make sure that
>> it works
>
> I assume "it works" refers to "it compiles" not "it executes successfully"?
It execute successfully, at least on 3.14 + bunch of backported
changes. I tested it on chromiumos 3.14 kernel and 64bit tegra board.
> I think it'd be better to make the same APIs available on arm and arm64,
> or even across all architectures.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c
>> index d2616ef..e0123c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c
>> @@ -29,8 +29,12 @@
>> #include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>> +#include <asm/time.h>
>> +#else
>> #include <asm/mach/time.h>
>> #include <asm/smp_twd.h>
>> +#endif
>>
>> #define RTC_SECONDS 0x08
>> #define RTC_SHADOW_SECONDS 0x0c
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/