[PATCH RFC] trace, blktrace: remove trace from running list only if trace is running
From: Arianna Avanzini
Date: Sat Nov 08 2014 - 10:15:06 EST
Currently, blktrace can be started/stopped via its ioctl-based interface
(used by the userspace blktrace tool) or via its ftrace interface. The
function blk_trace_remove_queue(), called each time an "enable" tunable
of the ftrace interface transitions to zero, removes unconditionally the
trace from the running list, even if its state is not Blktrace_running.
In fact, the state of a blk_trace is modified only by the ioctl-based
interface, and a blk_trace is added to the running list only when its
state transitions from Blktrace_setup or Blktrace_stopped to
Blktrace_running. If the ioctl-based interface is not being used, the
state of the blk_trace is undefined.
In this case, using the sysfs tunable to stop a trace would trigger a
removal of a blk_trace from the running list while it is not on such a
list, leading to a null pointer dereference. This commit attempts to fix
the issue by letting the blk_trace_remove_queue() function remove the
blk_trace from the running list only if its state is Blktrace_running.
Signed-off-by: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index c1bd4ad..f58b617 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -1493,9 +1493,11 @@ static int blk_trace_remove_queue(struct request_queue *q)
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&blk_probes_ref))
blk_unregister_tracepoints();
- spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
- list_del(&bt->running_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ list_del(&bt->running_list);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ }
blk_trace_free(bt);
return 0;
}
--
2.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/