Re: [RFC] perf-cache command interface design
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Mon Nov 10 2014 - 07:31:59 EST
Em Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:05:45PM +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer escreveu:
> On 7 November 2014 09:21, Masami Hiramatsu
> <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > File Format
> > ===========
> > All the cache files are placed under ~/.debug/ by default.
> > The paths of buildid cache of binary/symbols are not changed.
> >
> > The SDT/probe caches are placed under the ~/.debug/.probes/path/to/bin/bu/ildid
> > and that is linked to ~/.debug/.probes/.buildid/bu/ildid
> > # To avoid conflict with files under /probes/*, I picked up .probes/.
>
> A little bit late: but why ~/.debug? Why not $XDG_CACHE_HOME/perf/ as
Why "perf"?
> the root for all perf related files? debug is not unique nor is it sufficient
Probably should be some other name then, but ~/.debug/ is there since
the build-id cache was introduced, guess this is why it is being kept so
far in Masami's proposal.
> to meet file hierarchy: man file-hierarchy(8)
Humm,
It starts in $HOME/.debug/ because this is not supposed to be a system
wide cache, a developer can, for instance:
1. perf record myapp
2. edit myapp.c
3. rebuild it
4. perf record myapp
5. perf diff
And it will show the difference from the previous version, for which it
stored a copy of its binary on its private, keyed by build-id, cache.
So this is not merely a place where we will read stuff from.
If somebody decides to have it in a place accessible by multiple users
on the same system, then, yes, some more suitable place outside its
$HOME is needed, and then tooling should look there as well as on the
places it already looks for such files, i.e. $HOME/.debug/,
/usr/lib/debug (where foo-debuginfo packages store stuff, also keyed by
build-id), /lib/modules/$KVR/, etc.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/