Re: [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment

[Christoph Lameter]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> Would it make sense for unlimited max deferment to be available as
> a boot parameter?  That would allow people who want tick-free execution
> more than accurate stats to get that easily, while keeping stats accurate
> for everyone else.

Well at least it would help us to get started on figuring out how to
deal with other  processor interruptions that occur in intervals of
seconds or minutes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/