Re: crypto: zeroization of sensitive data in af_alg

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Mon Nov 10 2014 - 21:53:42 EST


On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:06:32AM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Montag, 10. November 2014, 22:05:18 schrieb Herbert Xu:
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:33:52PM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > while working on the AF_ALG interface, I saw no active zeroizations of
> > > memory that may hold sensitive data that is maintained outside the kernel
> > > crypto API cipher handles. I think the following memory segments fall
> > > under that
> > > category:
> > Are you talking about temporary data that we generate as part of
> > the processing? If so they should be zeroed by the entity that
> > generates them.
>
> I currently see that the IV buffer (owned by skcipher) and the message digest
> buffer (owned by hash) are not memset(0) before freeing them. I agree that
> both are not really sensitive data. But wouldn't it be prudent to memset(0)
> them nonetheless in the skcipher_sock_destruct and hash_sock_destruct
> functions, respectively?

Yes please submit your patches.

> Apologies, my bad as I did not check get_user_pages_fast well enough. I see
> now that we operate on the pages in user space directly without copy_from_user
> that would imply a kernel-internal copy. Please disregard my comment.

OK.

Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/