Re: [PATCH 1/3] autofs - fix log print messages
From: Ian Kent
Date: Tue Nov 11 2014 - 01:02:04 EST
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 21:49 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 13:37 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 19:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 09:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > Fix some inconsistencies in log print output and ensure that
> > > > the module name is included in all log prints.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/autofs/autofs_i.h | 6 +++---
> > > > fs/autofs/dev-ioctl.c | 2 +-
> > > > fs/autofs/inode.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > > fs/autofs/waitq.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > What tree are these patches made against?
> >
> > They live in an StGit patch queue against the current Linus tree.
> > They depend on the prior series to rename autofs4 to autofs.
>
> Hey Ian.
>
> Maybe you could add the git tree location to
> the MAINTAINERS entry:
>
> MAINTAINERS-KERNEL AUTOMOUNTER v4 (AUTOFS4)
> MAINTAINERS-M: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx>
> MAINTAINERS-L: autofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> MAINTAINERS-S: Maintained
> MAINTAINERS:F: fs/autofs4/
>
> T: git git://somewhere_or_other...
>
> and maybe you also could get Stephen Rothwell
> to add that tree to -next
Oh, you meant what public tree.
I guess I could make a kernel.org tree but, apart from this recent
rename autofs4 -> autofs, the number of autofs changes hasn't warranted
maintaining a separate tree for quite a while.
It looks like the place holder under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/raven is
no longer present so I expect I'd need to request that be setup.
That's why I just send my patches to Andrew to include them in -next.
Andrew, thoughts?
Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/