Re: Future of NOHZ full/isolation development (was Re: [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment)

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> I guess I should have remembered that before suggesting this to Christoph,
> my apologies to all!

No this is good. Do not worry. I can just throw out the one or other patch
to ensure that the discussion continues and then we can figure out how to
come up with a correct solution. Patches are a way to say that you are
serious about an issue on lkml.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/