Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only)

[Dave Chinner]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:03:14PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Milosz Tanski <milosz@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> Can you write a test (or set of) for fstests that exercises this new
> >> functionality? I'm not worried about performance, just
> >> correctness....
> >
> > Sure thing. Can you point me at the fstests repo? A quick google
> > search reveals lots of projects named fstests, most of them abandoned.
> 
> I think he's referring to xfstests.  Still, I think that's the wrong
> place for functional testing.  ltp would be better, imo.

I don't follow. Can you explain why is xfstests be the wrong place
to exercise this functionality and what makes ltp a better choice?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/