[PATCH 3.14 190/203] sched: Use rq->rd in sched_setaffinity() under RCU read lock

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit f1e3a0932f3a9554371792a7daaf1e0eb19f66d5 upstream.

Probability of use-after-free isn't zero in this place.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140922183636.11015.83611.stgit@localhost
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3941,13 +3941,14 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const
 	 * root_domain.
 	 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
-		const struct cpumask *span = task_rq(p)->rd->span;
-
-		if (dl_bandwidth_enabled() && !cpumask_subset(span, new_mask)) {
+	if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) {
 			retval = -EBUSY;
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			goto out_unlock;
 		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 #endif
 again:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/