Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL request

From: AKASHI Takahiro
Date: Wed Nov 12 2014 - 05:46:17 EST


Will,

On 11/07/2014 11:04 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/07, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:

--- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -853,11 +853,6 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request,
datap);
break;

- case PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL:
- task_thread_info(child)->syscall = data;
- ret = 0;
- break;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_CRUNCH
case PTRACE_GETCRUNCHREGS:
ret = ptrace_getcrunchregs(child, datap);
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 54e7522..d7048fa 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1001,6 +1001,12 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request,
break;
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL
+ case PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL:
+ ret = syscall_set_nr(child, task_pt_regs(child), data);
+ break;
+#endif

I too do not understand why it makes sense to move PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL into
the common kernel/ptrace.c.

I think I explained why we need a new (atomic) interface of changing a system
call number while tracing with ptrace. But I don't have a strong preference,
either ptrace(SET_SYSCALL) or ptrace(SETREGSET, NT_SYSTEM_CALL).

To me the fact that PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL can be undefined and syscall_set_nr()
is very much arch-dependant (but most probably trivial) means that this code
should live in arch_ptrace().

Thinking of Oleg's comment above, it doesn't make sense neither to define generic
NT_SYSTEM_CALL (user_regset) in uapi/linux/elf.h and implement it in ptrace_regset()
in kernel/ptrace.c with arch-defined syscall_(g)set_nr().

Since we should have the same interface on arm and arm64, we'd better implement
ptrace(PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL) locally on arm64 for now (as I originally submitted).

-Takahiro AKASHI

In any case, I think it doesn't make sense to pass task_pt_regs(child), this
helper can do this itself if it needs struct pt_regs.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/