Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/iommu: fix incorrect bit operations in setting values

[Minfei Huang]

The kdump starts 2nd kernel without any error message when I use
3.18.0-rc4 merged last 6 patchs. The following is the message which 2nd
kernel prints during booting.

Patchset:
	0001-iommu-vt-d-Update-iommu_attach_domain-and-its-caller.patch
	0002-iommu-vt-d-Items-required-for-kdump.patch
	0003-iommu-vt-d-data-types-and-functions-used-for-kdump.patch
	0004-iommu-vt-d-Add-domain-id-functions.patch
	0005-iommu-vt-d-enable-kdump-support-in-iommu-module.patch
	0006-x86-iommu-fix-incorrect-bit-operations-in-setting-va.patch

log:
[    1.689604] IOMMU intel_iommu_in_crashdump = true
[    1.694310] IOMMU Skip disabling iommu hardware translations
[    1.699987] DMAR: No ATSR found
[    1.703151] IOMMU Copying translate tables from panicked kernel
[    1.710786] IOMMU: root_new_virt:0xffff8800296ec000 phys:0x0000296ec000
[    1.717401] IOMMU:0 Domain ids from panicked kernel:
[    1.722364] DID did:13(0x000d)
[    1.725424] DID did:12(0x000c)
[    1.728482] DID did:11(0x000b)
[    1.731542] DID did:10(0x000a)
[    1.734603] DID did:6(0x0006)
[    1.737574] DID did:7(0x0007)
[    1.740549] DID did:5(0x0005)
[    1.743522] DID did:9(0x0009)
[    1.746495] DID did:8(0x0008)
[    1.749467] DID did:4(0x0004)
[    1.752439] DID did:3(0x0003)
[    1.755413] DID did:2(0x0002)
[    1.758385] DID did:0(0x0000)
[    1.761357] DID did:1(0x0001)
[    1.764331] ----------------------------------------
[    1.769302] IOMMU 0 0xfed50000: using Queued invalidation

On 11/05/14 at 03:30pm, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
> The function context_set_address_root() and set_root_value are setting new
> address in a wrong way, and this patch is trying to fix this problem.
> 
> According to Intel Vt-d specs(Feb 2011, Revision 1.3), Chapter 9.1 and 9.2,
> field ctp in root entry is using bits 12:63, field asr in context entry is
> using bits 12:63.
> 
> To set these fields, the following functions are used:
> static inline void context_set_address_root(struct context_entry *context,
>         unsigned long value);
> and
> static inline void set_root_value(struct root_entry *root, unsigned long value)
> 
> But they are using an invalid method to set these fields, in current code, only
> a '|' operator is used to set it. This will not set the asr to the expected
> value if it has an old value.
> 
> For example:
> Before calling this function,
> 	context->lo = 0x3456789012111;
> 	value = 0x123456789abcef12;
> 
> After we call context_set_address_root(context, value), expected result is
> 	context->lo == 0x123456789abce111;
> 
> But the actual result is:
> 	context->lo == 0x1237577f9bbde111;
> 
> So we need to clear bits 12:63 before setting the new value, this will fix
> this problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua <zhen-hual@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index a27d6cb..11ac47b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static inline void set_root_present(struct root_entry *root)
>  }
>  static inline void set_root_value(struct root_entry *root, unsigned long value)
>  {
> +	root->val &= ~VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>  	root->val |= value & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>  }
>  
> @@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ static inline void context_set_translation_type(struct context_entry *context,
>  static inline void context_set_address_root(struct context_entry *context,
>  					    unsigned long value)
>  {
> +	context->lo &= ~VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>  	context->lo |= value & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.0.0-rc0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/