Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Per-user clock constraints

[Tomeu Vizoso]

On 31 October 2014 12:33, Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:48:26AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this fifth version of the series has just one change, suggested by Stephen:

Hi Mike, how is this looking for 3.19?

Regards,

Tomeu

>> * Initialize clk.ceiling_constraint to ULONG_MAX and warn about new floor
>> constraints being higher than the existing ceiling.
>>
>> The first five patches are just cleanups that should be desirable on their own,
>> and that should make easier to review the actual per-user clock patch.
>>
>> The sixth patch actually moves the per-clock data that was stored in struct
>> clk to a new struct clk_core and adds references to it from both struct clk and
>> struct clk_hw. struct clk is now ready to contain information that is specific
>> to a given clk consumer.
>>
>> The seventh patch adds API for setting floor and ceiling constraints and stores
>> that information on the per-user struct clk, which is iterable from struct
>> clk_core.
>>
>> They are based on top of 3.18-rc1.
>>
>> http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=per-user-clk-constraints-v5
>>
>
> Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Mike,
>
> Do you think this will be merged for 3.19?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/