Re: [PATCH] PM / domains: Kconfig: always enable PM_RUNTIME when genpd enabled

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Fri Nov 14 2014 - 02:28:26 EST


On 14 November 2014 08:26, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 13 November 2014 23:28, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> It makes little sense to use generic power domains without runtime PM.
>> Also, since the complexities of handling the !PM_RUNTIME case are
>> causing more trouble and confusion than they're worth, let's simplify
>> the world by making genpd always enable runtime PM.
>
> I do agree that your above statement seems reasonable, even if can't
> really tell if that would break some SOCs use-cases.
>
> My concern is though, that I fear we will be taking short-cuts in
> genpd that might bite us later on, but I might be wrong.
>
> The reason for my concern is that on every other place, like in the
> subsystem level, driver core, PM core and of course in drivers - we
> need to cope with all the combinations of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. So theoretically, why shouldn't genpd be able to do

/s /CONFIG_PM_SLEEP /CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME

> that as well?
>
>>
>> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/power/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
>> index 3d39cc0228e9..2a8c64d0a43c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
>> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ config PM_CLK
>>
>> config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>> bool
>> - depends on PM
>> + select PM_RUNTIME
>
> Shouldn't we actually depend on PM_RUNTIME instead?
>
>>
>> config WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT
>> bool "Enable workqueue power-efficient mode by default"
>> --
>> 2.1.3
>>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/