Re: [PATCH vfs 1/2] lib: implement ptrset

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Nov 14 2014 - 08:12:12 EST


Hello, Andrew.

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:40:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> In that case tjpointer_add() would need to do a kmalloc() for each inode
> which is added to the bdev/cdev, just as ptrset_add() is doing.
>
> That might require a nasty preload thing. But really, for just two
> known callers it would be better to require the caller to create the
> storage.
>
>
> struct tjpointer *new_tpj;
>
> new_tpj = kmalloc(...);
> lock();
> tjpointer_add(&my_tjp_list, new_tjp, my_pointer);
> unlock();
>
> Basically what I'm saying is nuke the rbtree and use lists.

Hah? Then, each removal would be O(N) where N is the number of total
block devices and there are cases where massive number of block
devices exist and many are added / removed back-to-back. I don't
think making those operations O(N^2) is a good idea.

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/