Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] bpf: add 'flags' attribute to BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Do, 2014-11-13 at 17:36 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> the current meaning of BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM syscall command is:
>> either update existing map element or create a new one.
>> Initially the plan was to add a new command to handle the case of
>> 'create new element if it didn't exist', but 'flags' style looks
>> cleaner and overall diff is much smaller (more code reused), so add 'flags'
>> attribute to BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command with the following meaning:
>>  #define BPF_ANY      0 /* create new element or update existing */
>>  #define BPF_NOEXIST  1 /* create new element if it didn't exist */
>>  #define BPF_EXIST    2 /* update existing element */
>
> Would a cmpxchg-alike function be handy here?

you mean cmpxchg command in addition to
update() command ?
May be... it will have an extra 'value' argument
(key, old_value, new_value)
I don't have a use case for it yet though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/