Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel-audit: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "audit_log_end" (or improve error handling?)

[SF Markus Elfring]

> The original code is very clear, the new code works exactly the same but
> it's not clear if the author forgot about handling errors from
> audit_log_start().

We have got different expectations on source code clarity here.


> So now someone will come along later and add:
> 	if (!ab)
> 		return;
> 
> We get a lot of mindless "add error handling" patches like that.

This is an interesting background information.

Do you eventually prefer to improve the affected error detection
and corresponding exception handling?
Will a condition check become absolutely necessary there?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/