Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel-trace: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "iput"

[Julia Lawall]

On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 14:46:28 +0100
>
> The iput() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 33ff6a2..ec002c0 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -552,8 +552,7 @@ error:
>  	return ret;
>
>  fail_address_parse:
> -	if (inode)
> -		iput(inode);
> +	iput(inode);

There are jumps to fail_address_parse where the value of inode can only be
NULL.

julia

>
>  	pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
>
> --
> 2.1.3
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/