[ 33/48] fix misuses of f_count() in ppp and netlink

[Willy Tarreau]

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

we used to check for "nobody else could start doing anything with
that opened file" by checking that refcount was 2 or less - one
for descriptor table and one we'd acquired in fget() on the way to
wherever we are.  That was race-prone (somebody else might have
had a reference to descriptor table and do fget() just as we'd
been checking) and it had become flat-out incorrect back when
we switched to fget_light() on those codepaths - unlike fget(),
it doesn't grab an extra reference unless the descriptor table
is shared.  The same change allowed a race-free check, though -
we are safe exactly when refcount is less than 2.

It was a long time ago; pre-2.6.12 for ioctl() (the codepath leading
to ppp one) and 2.6.17 for sendmsg() (netlink one).  OTOH,
netlink hadn't grown that check until 3.9 and ppp used to live
in drivers/net, not drivers/net/ppp until 3.1.  The bug existed
well before that, though, and the same fix used to apply in old
location of file.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 24dff96a37a2ca319e75a74d3929b2de22447ca6)
[wt: apply to drivers/net/ppp_generic.c only]
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ppp_generic.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
index 965adb6..5e9156a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 			if (file == ppp->owner)
 				ppp_shutdown_interface(ppp);
 		}
-		if (atomic_long_read(&file->f_count) <= 2) {
+		if (atomic_long_read(&file->f_count) < 2) {
 			ppp_release(NULL, file);
 			err = 0;
 		} else
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/