Re: [PATCH] ACPI / WAKEUP : enable wakeup power for physical child devices

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, November 16, 2014 03:10:01 PM Andrey Skvortsov wrote:
> commit f2b56bc808addb908a5bf435d9b942c02af9a7c4
> ("ACPI / PM: Use device wakeup flags for handling ACPI wakeup devices")

That commit is from 2011.  Can you please tell me what makes you think
that it is the source of the problem?

> broke wake-on-lan for Broadcom BCM4401 Ethernet card (b44) on Dell Vostro 1500 laptop.
> device_may_wakeup for main ACPI device (PCIE) returns false, because it has
> can_wakeup = 0. Therefore any physical devices connected to this parent
> were not prepared for wakeup/suspend. But physical device is capable to
> wakeup the system.

If that is the case, then ->

> To fix this issue device_may_wakeup was replaced with acpi_device_may_wakeup.
> acpi_device_may_wakeup was written based on function
> acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Skvortsov <Andrej.Skvortzov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/wakeup.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> index 1638401..0da7e70 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,34 @@
>  #define _COMPONENT		ACPI_SYSTEM_COMPONENT
>  ACPI_MODULE_NAME("wakeup_devices")
>  
> +
> +bool acpi_device_may_wakeup(struct acpi_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_device_physical_node *entry;
> +	bool may_wakeup = false;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dev->physical_node_lock);
> +	if (!dev->physical_node_count)
> +		may_wakeup = device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev);
> +	else {
> +		struct device *ldev;
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->physical_node_list, node) {
> +			ldev = get_device(entry->dev);
> +			if (!ldev)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			may_wakeup = device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev) ||
> +				device_may_wakeup(ldev);
> +
> +			put_device(ldev);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->physical_node_lock);
> +	return may_wakeup;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * acpi_enable_wakeup_devices - Enable wake-up device GPEs.
>   * @sleep_state: ACPI system sleep state.
> @@ -35,13 +63,14 @@ void acpi_enable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state)
>  		struct acpi_device *dev =
>  			container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
>  
> +
>  		if (!dev->wakeup.flags.valid
> -		    || sleep_state > (u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state
> -		    || !(device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev)
> -		        || dev->wakeup.prepare_count))
> +			|| sleep_state > (u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state
> +			|| !(acpi_device_may_wakeup(dev)
> +			    || dev->wakeup.prepare_count))

-> dev->wakeup.prepare_count here shold be different from 0 at this point.

>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev))
> +		if (acpi_device_may_wakeup(dev))
>  			acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(dev, sleep_state);
>  
>  		/* The wake-up power should have been enabled already. */
> @@ -63,15 +92,15 @@ void acpi_disable_wakeup_devices(u8 sleep_state)
>  			container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
>  
>  		if (!dev->wakeup.flags.valid
> -		    || sleep_state > (u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state
> -		    || !(device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev)
> -		        || dev->wakeup.prepare_count))
> +			|| sleep_state > (u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state
> +			|| !(acpi_device_may_wakeup(dev)
> +				|| dev->wakeup.prepare_count))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask(dev->wakeup.gpe_device, dev->wakeup.gpe_number,
>  				ACPI_GPE_DISABLE);
>  
> -		if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev))
> +		if (acpi_device_may_wakeup(dev))
>  			acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power(dev);
>  	}
>  }

This is not the right fix.  The device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev) check in the
above code is specifically for ACPI device objects that do *not* have physical
devices assiciated with them (buttons etc.).

I'll have a look at the driver in question next week (please remind me in
case I get distracted).


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/