[PATCH v4 2/2] x86, mce: support memory error recovery for both UCNA and Deferred error in machine_check_poll
From: Chen Yucong
Date: Mon Nov 17 2014 - 21:10:26 EST
Uncorrected no action required (UCNA) - is a uncorrected recoverable
machine check error that is not signaled via a machine check exception
and, instead, is reported to system software as a corrected machine
check error. UCNA errors indicate that some data in the system is
corrupted, but the data has not been consumed and the processor state
is valid and you may continue execution on this processor. UCNA errors
require no action from system software to continue execution. Note that
UCNA errors are supported by the processor only when IA32_MCG_CAP[24]
(MCG_SER_P) is set.
-- Intel SDM Volume 3B
Deferred errors are errors that cannot be corrected by hardware, but
do not cause an immediate interruption in program flow, loss of data
integrity, or corruption of processor state. These errors indicate
that data has been corrupted but not consumed. Hardware writes information
to the status and address registers in the corresponding bank that
identifies the source of the error if deferred errors are enabled for
logging. Deferred errors are not reported via machine check exceptions;
they can be seen by polling the MCi_STATUS registers.
-- AMD64 APM Volume 2
Above two items, both UCNA and Deferred errors belong to detected
errors, but they can't be corrected by hardware, and this is very
similar to Software Recoverable Action Optional (SRAO) errors.
Therefore, we can take some actions that have been used for handling
SRAO errors to handle UCNA and Deferred errors.
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 453e9bf..cfb16f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -575,6 +575,37 @@ static void mce_read_aux(struct mce *m, int i)
}
}
+static bool memory_error(struct mce *m)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
+
+ if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
+ /*
+ * coming soon
+ */
+ return false;
+ } else if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
+ /*
+ * Intel SDM Volume 3B - 15.9.2 Compound Error Codes
+ *
+ * Bit 7 of the MCACOD field of IA32_MCi_STATUS is used for
+ * indicating a memory error. Bit 8 is used for indicating a
+ * cache hierarchy error. The combination of bit 2 and bit 3
+ * is used for indicating a `generic' cache hierarchy error
+ * But we can't just blindly check the above bits, because if
+ * bit 11 is set, then it is a bus/interconnect error - and
+ * either way the above bits just gives more detail on what
+ * bus/interconnect error happened. Note that bit 12 can be
+ * ignored, as it's the "filter" bit.
+ */
+ return (m->status & 0xef80) == BIT(7) ||
+ (m->status & 0xef00) == BIT(8) ||
+ (m->status & 0xeffc) == 0xc;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned, mce_poll_count);
/*
@@ -595,6 +626,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned, mce_poll_count);
void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
{
struct mce m;
+ int severity;
int i;
this_cpu_inc(mce_poll_count);
@@ -630,6 +662,20 @@ void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
if (!(flags & MCP_TIMESTAMP))
m.tsc = 0;
+
+ severity = mce_severity(&m, mca_cfg.tolerant, NULL, false);
+
+ /*
+ * In the cases where we don't have a valid address after all,
+ * do not add it into the ring buffer.
+ */
+ if (severity == MCE_DEFERRED_SEVERITY && memory_error(&m)) {
+ if (m.status & MCI_STATUS_ADDRV) {
+ mce_ring_add(m.addr >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ mce_schedule_work();
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* Don't get the IP here because it's unlikely to
* have anything to do with the actual error location.
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/