[RFC PATCH v3 5/5] rtc/mc13xxx: Eliminate time problems
From: pang.xunlei
Date: Tue Nov 18 2014 - 06:20:40 EST
This patch is an example to demonstrate how to make rtc drivers
of time-safe hardwares time-safe based on our foregoing work.
Provided mc13xxx_rtc_set_mmss() has been already converted to use
64-bit seconds which will be done in my future patches, now we can
easily tackle all time problems in rtc-mc13xxx.c(time-safe hardware):
- Replace rtc_time_to_tm() with rtc_time64_to_tm()
- Replace rtc_tm_to_time() with rtc_tm_to_time64()
Then, this driver can work properly with no time issues.
Signed-off-by: pang.xunlei <pang.xunlei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c
index 0765606..124996d 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mc13xxx.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
return ret;
} while (days1 != days2);
- rtc_time_to_tm(days1 * SEC_PER_DAY + seconds, tm);
+ rtc_time64_to_tm((time64_t)days1 * SEC_PER_DAY + seconds, tm);
return rtc_valid_tm(tm);
}
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
{
struct mc13xxx_rtc *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned seconds, days;
- unsigned long s1970;
+ time64_t s1970;
int enabled, pending;
int ret;
@@ -189,10 +189,10 @@ out:
alarm->enabled = enabled;
alarm->pending = pending;
- s1970 = days * SEC_PER_DAY + seconds;
+ s1970 = (time64_t)days * SEC_PER_DAY + seconds;
- rtc_time_to_tm(s1970, &alarm->time);
- dev_dbg(dev, "%s: %lu\n", __func__, s1970);
+ rtc_time64_to_tm(s1970, &alarm->time);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s: %lld\n", __func__, (long long)s1970);
return 0;
}
@@ -200,8 +200,8 @@ out:
static int mc13xxx_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
{
struct mc13xxx_rtc *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- unsigned long s1970;
- unsigned seconds, days;
+ time64_t s1970;
+ u32 seconds, days;
int ret;
mc13xxx_lock(priv->mc13xxx);
@@ -215,20 +215,17 @@ static int mc13xxx_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
if (unlikely(ret))
goto out;
- ret = rtc_tm_to_time(&alarm->time, &s1970);
- if (unlikely(ret))
- goto out;
+ s1970 = rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time);
- dev_dbg(dev, "%s: o%2.s %lu\n", __func__, alarm->enabled ? "n" : "ff",
- s1970);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s: o%2.s %lld\n", __func__, alarm->enabled ? "n" : "ff",
+ (long long)s1970);
ret = mc13xxx_rtc_irq_enable_unlocked(dev, alarm->enabled,
MC13XXX_IRQ_TODA);
if (unlikely(ret))
goto out;
- seconds = s1970 % SEC_PER_DAY;
- days = s1970 / SEC_PER_DAY;
+ days = div_s64_rem(s1970, SEC_PER_DAY, &seconds);
ret = mc13xxx_reg_write(priv->mc13xxx, MC13XXX_RTCDAYA, days);
if (unlikely(ret))
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/