Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: Modify cpudl.free_cpus to reflect rd->span

[pang.xunlei]

On 18 November 2014 03:39, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:11:03 +0800
>
>> index 539ca3c..9a69353
>> --- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
>> @@ -107,7 +107,9 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
>>       int best_cpu = -1;
>>       const struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
>>
>> -     if (later_mask && cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cp->free_cpus)) {
>> +     if (later_mask && cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus,
>> +                     &p->cpus_allowed) && cpumask_and(later_mask,
>> +                     later_mask, cpu_active_mask)) {
>
> I did a quick review of this patch, and it looks fine to me. But the
> above looks ugly. Please change it to something more readable like:

Yes, the following looks beautiful. I'll adjust it, thanks!
>
>         if (later_mask &&
>             cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus, &p->cpus_allowed) &&
>             cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cpu_active_mask)) {
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>>               best_cpu = cpumask_any(later_mask);
>>               goto out;
>>       } else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpudl_maximum(cp), &p->cpus_allowed) &&
>> @@ -186,6 +188,17 @@ out:
>>  }
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/