Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] ARM64: Move the init of cpu_logical_map(0) before unflatten_device_tree()

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:02:05PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 18/11/14 16:57, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:43:13PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:45:49PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> On 2014å10æ17æ 21:36, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>>> It always make sense to initialize CPU0's logical map entry from the
> >>>> hardware values, so move the initialization of cpu_logical_map(0)
> >>>> before unflatten_device_tree() which is needed by ACPI code later.
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Could you merge this patch first in 3.19? It was acked by Olof and
> >>> Mark, and it will make sense without ACPI too.
> >>
> >> I think it can go in for 3.19 (it's Will's turn this time ;)).
> >
> > This patch doesn't apply on for-next/core, as it conflicts with some of
> > Rutland's rework ("arm64: log physical ID of boot CPU").
> >
> 
> It's actually not required anymore, as "arm64: log physical ID of boot
> CPU" move it quite early in the sequence from setup_arch to
> smp_setup_processor_id while this patch just moves it up in setup_arch.

Thanks Sudeep, I'd guessed as much :)

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/