Re: Implement lbr-as-callgraph v10

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Wed Nov 19 2014 - 01:22:20 EST


Hi Jiri,

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:00:07 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > Em Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:05:18PM -0800, Andi Kleen escreveu:
>> > > [Reworks to address all the review feedback. Rebased to latest tree]
>> > > [Just a repost after a rebase]
>> > > [Even more review feedback and some bugs addressed.]
>> > > [Only port to changes in perf/core. No other changes.]
>> > > [Rebase to latest perf/core]
>> > > [Another rebase. No changes]
>> > >
>> > > This patchkit implements lbr-as-callgraphs in per freport,
>> > > as an alternative way to present LBR information.
>> >
>> > Ok, I have this in my perf/core branch, but I need to test it further,
>> > as I couldn't get the output that appears on some of the changelogs.
>> >
>> > If you could take a look at
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux perf/core
>> >
>> > To see if I made some mistake, that would be of help,
>> >
>>
>> I'm getting compile error for DEBUG=1
>
> looks like the BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG does not work correctly with -O6 we use

Nope, DEBUG=1 prevents -O6 from applied. we have below in config/Makefile:

ifndef DEBUG
DEBUG := 0
endif

ifeq ($(DEBUG),0)
CFLAGS += -O6
endif


Looking at include/linux/bug.h, BUILD_BUG_ON is guarded under
__OPTIMIZE__ but BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG is not. What about changing it to
BUILD_BUG_ON then?

Thanks,
Namhyung


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/