Re: [PATCH 2/4] gpiolib: use const parameters when possible
From: Alexandre Courbot
Date: Wed Nov 19 2014 - 03:58:13 EST
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Alexandre,
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 05:33:42PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig
>> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:03:00PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> >> From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> Constify descriptor parameter of gpiod_* functions for those that
>> >> should obviously not modify it. This includes value or direction get,
>> >> cansleep, and IRQ number query.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > This patch is applied as def634338d3ffb32fbe9b0a2d70cc24ef909cd4f since
>> > v3.9-rc2.
>> >
>> >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>> >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> >> index 8a2cf9c..ad6df6b 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> >> @@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ static int gpiochip_find_base(int ngpio)
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> /* caller ensures gpio is valid and requested, chip->get_direction may sleep */
>> >> -static int gpiod_get_direction(struct gpio_desc *desc)
>> >> +static int gpiod_get_direction(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
>> >> {
>> >> struct gpio_chip *chip;
>> >> unsigned offset;
>> >> @@ -223,11 +224,13 @@ static int gpiod_get_direction(struct gpio_desc *desc)
>> >> if (status > 0) {
>> >> /* GPIOF_DIR_IN, or other positive */
>> >> status = 1;
>> >> - clear_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags);
>> >> + /* FLAG_IS_OUT is just a cache of the result of get_direction(),
>> >> + * so it does not affect constness per se */
>> >> + clear_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &((struct gpio_desc *)desc)->flags);
>> > I think this is worse than not having gpiod_get_direction take a const
>> > descriptor.
>>
>> Yeah, this kind of sucks but ultimately gpiod_get_direction() is
>> without side-effect to the caller and the const parameter helps
>> highlighting that fact.
> Does that mean you want to keep the const and take the risk that it
> might introduce some hard to debug problem when the compiler changes its
> optimisation strategies? I hope you don't.
Nope, I would like to keep that const but correctness is more
important than prototype aesthetics. I will fix that.
>> > I don't know an example for this particular case where this could break,
>> > but usually casting away a const is bad and can break in various ways.
>> >
>> > Maybe even drop the public function gpiod_get_direction completely.
>> > As of next-20141114 there are only two users of this function (apart
>> > from drivers/gpio/gpiolib*) and both are wrong (as discussed in
>> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.serial/16808/focus=4783).
>>
>> Or maybe gpiod_direction_*() should register the last set direction to
>> be used by gpiod_get_direction() if the controller does not implement
>> the get_direction op? On the other hand callers can also track the
>> direction themselves (since they presumably set it), so this function
>> is really only useful for users who want to read the *hardware* state
>> of a GPIO. Which might still be a useful feature?
> I think it's useful to be able to check how a given gpio is configured
> in hardware. So you really want to look into the register and not cache
> the direction in gpiod_direction_*.
> And I'd say having /sys/kernel/debug/gpio is good enough. So IMHO there
> is no reason to hide gpiod_get_direction from general misuse.
Mmm so are you suggesting that we should keep gpiod_get_direction() in the end?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/