Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Add _DEP(Operation Region Dependencies) support to fix battery issue on the Asus T100TA

[Mika Westerberg]

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:20:41PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> ACPI 5.0 introduces _DEP to designate device objects that OSPM should
> assign a higher priority in start ordering due to future operation region
> accesses.
> 
> On Asus T100TA, ACPI battery info are read from a I2C slave device via
> I2C operation region. Before I2C operation region handler is installed,
> battery _STA always returns 0. There is a _DEP method of designating
> start order under battery device node.
> 
> This patch is to implement _DEP feature to fix battery issue on the Asus T100TA.
> Introducing acpi_dep_list and adding dep_unmet count in the struct
> acpi_device. During ACPI namespace scan, create struct acpi_dep_data for a
> valid pair of master (device pointed to by _DEP)/slave(device with _DEP), record
> master's and slave's ACPI handle in it and put it into acpi_dep_list. The dep_unmet
> count will increase by one if there is a device under its _DEP. Driver's probe() should
> return EPROBE_DEFER when find dep_unmet larger than 0. When I2C operation
> region handler is installed, remove all struct acpi_dep_data on the acpi_dep_list
> whose master is pointed to I2C host controller and decrease slave's dep_unmet.
> When dep_unmet decreases to 0, all _DEP conditions are met and then do acpi_bus_attach()
> for the device in order to resolve battery _STA issue on the Asus T100TA.
> 
> Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69011 
> Tested-by: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Adam Williamson <adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Michael Shigorin <shigorin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/battery.c  |  4 +++
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c     | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c  |  1 +
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
>  include/linux/acpi.h    |  3 ++
>  5 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> index 8ec8a89..d98ba43 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> @@ -1180,6 +1180,10 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  
>  	if (!device)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (device->dep_unmet)
> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
>  	battery = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_battery), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!battery)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 9cb5cca..0e58666 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ bool acpi_force_hot_remove;
>  
>  static const char *dummy_hid = "device";
>  
> +static LIST_HEAD(acpi_dep_list);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_dep_list_lock);
>  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_bus_id_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_scan_lock);
>  static LIST_HEAD(acpi_scan_handlers_list);
> @@ -43,6 +45,12 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
>  LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
>  
> +struct acpi_dep_data {
> +	struct list_head node;
> +	acpi_handle master;
> +	acpi_handle slave;
> +};
> +
>  struct acpi_device_bus_id{
>  	char bus_id[15];
>  	unsigned int instance_no;
> @@ -2193,6 +2201,61 @@ static void acpi_scan_init_hotplug(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void acpi_device_dep_initialize(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_dep_data *dep;
> +	struct acpi_handle_list dep_devices;
> +	struct acpi_device_info *info;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	int i, skip;
> +
> +	if (!acpi_has_method(adev->handle, "_DEP"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_reference(adev->handle, "_DEP", NULL,
> +					&dep_devices);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		dev_err(&adev->dev, "Failed to evaluate _DEP.\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dep_devices.count; i++) {
> +

Delete the black line.

> +		status = acpi_get_object_info(dep_devices.handles[i], &info);
> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +			dev_err(&adev->dev, "Error reading device info\n");
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Skip the dependency of Windows System Power
> +		 * Management Controller
> +		 */
> +		if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_HID
> +		    && !strcmp(info->hardware_id.string, "INT3396"))
> +			skip = 1;
> +		else
> +			skip = 0;
> +
> +		kfree(info);
> +
> +		if (skip)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		dep = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_dep_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!dep)
> +			return;
> +
> +		dep->master = dep_devices.handles[i];
> +		dep->slave  = adev->handle;
> +		adev->dep_unmet++;
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
> +		list_add_tail(&dep->node , &acpi_dep_list);
> +		mutex_unlock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
>  				      void *not_used, void **return_value)
>  {
> @@ -2219,6 +2282,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
>  		return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
>  
>  	acpi_scan_init_hotplug(device);
> +	acpi_device_dep_initialize(device);
>  
>   out:
>  	if (!*return_value)
> @@ -2339,6 +2403,31 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device)
>  		device->handler->hotplug.notify_online(device);
>  }
>  
> +int acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_handle handle)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_dep_data *dep, *tmp;
> +	struct acpi_device *adev;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, &acpi_dep_list, node) {
> +		if (dep->master == handle) {
> +			acpi_bus_get_device(dep->slave, &adev);
> +			if (!adev)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			adev->dep_unmet--;
> +			if (!adev->dep_unmet)
> +				acpi_bus_attach(adev);
> +			list_del(&dep->node);
> +			kfree(dep);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;

Since you always return 0, why nyt make it void instead?

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_walk_dep_device_list);
> +
>  /**
>   * acpi_bus_scan - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
>   * @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index f43b4e1..68aeb8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ static int acpi_i2c_install_space_handler(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> +	acpi_walk_dep_device_list(handle);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 7d1ce40..d539084 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ struct acpi_device {
>  	void *driver_data;
>  	struct device dev;
>  	unsigned int physical_node_count;
> +	unsigned int dep_unmet;
>  	struct list_head physical_node_list;
>  	struct mutex physical_node_lock;
>  	void (*remove)(struct acpi_device *);
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 10f2ed9..c60ea30 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ extern bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct device *dev,
>  				     const struct device_driver *drv);
>  int acpi_device_uevent_modalias(struct device *, struct kobj_uevent_env *);
>  int acpi_device_modalias(struct device *, char *, int);
> +int acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_handle handle);
>  
>  struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *);
>  #define ACPI_PTR(_ptr)	(_ptr)
> @@ -464,6 +465,8 @@ static inline const char *acpi_dev_name(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  
>  static inline void acpi_early_init(void) { }
>  
> +static inline int acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_handle handle) { }

This does not compile when !CONFIG_ACPI.

> +
>  static inline int early_acpi_boot_init(void)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/