[PATCH 3.10 48/70] br: fix use of ->rx_handler_data in code executed on non-rx_handler path

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 859828c0ea476b42f3a93d69d117aaba90994b6f upstream.

br_stp_rcv() is reached by non-rx_handler path. That means there is no
guarantee that dev is bridge port and therefore simple NULL check of
->rx_handler_data is not enough. There is need to check if dev is really
bridge port and since only rcu read lock is held here, do it by checking
->rx_handler pointer.

Note that synchronize_net() in netdev_rx_handler_unregister() ensures
this approach as valid.

Introduced originally by:
commit f350a0a87374418635689471606454abc7beaa3a
  "bridge: use rx_handler_data pointer to store net_bridge_port pointer"

Fixed but not in the best way by:
commit b5ed54e94d324f17c97852296d61a143f01b227a
  "bridge: fix RCU races with bridge port"

Reintroduced by:
commit 716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2
  "bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of br_port_get_rcu"

Please apply to stable trees as well. Thanks.

RH bugzilla reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025770

Reported-by: Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxxx>
Debugged-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Collins <bsderandrew@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 net/bridge/br_private.h  |   10 ++++++++++
 net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -429,6 +429,16 @@ extern netdev_features_t br_features_rec
 extern int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb);
 extern rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb);
 
+static inline bool br_rx_handler_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler) == br_handle_frame;
+}
+
+static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	return br_rx_handler_check_rcu(dev) ? br_port_get_rcu(dev) : NULL;
+}
+
 /* br_ioctl.c */
 extern int br_dev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd);
 extern int br_ioctl_deviceless_stub(struct net *net, unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg);
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void br_stp_rcv(const struct stp_proto *
 	if (buf[0] != 0 || buf[1] != 0 || buf[2] != 0)
 		goto err;
 
-	p = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
+	p = br_port_get_check_rcu(dev);
 	if (!p)
 		goto err;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/