[PATCH 3.10 66/70] x86: finish user fault error path with fatal signal

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Nov 19 2014 - 16:21:51 EST


3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 3a13c4d761b4b979ba8767f42345fed3274991b0 upstream.

The x86 fault handler bails in the middle of error handling when the
task has a fatal signal pending. For a subsequent patch this is a
problem in OOM situations because it relies on pagefault_out_of_memory()
being called even when the task has been killed, to perform proper
per-task OOM state unwinding.

Shortcutting the fault like this is a rather minor optimization that
saves a few instructions in rare cases. Just remove it for
user-triggered faults.

Use the opportunity to split the fault retry handling from actual fault
errors and add locking documentation that reads suprisingly similar to
ARM's.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: azurIt <azurit@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -842,23 +842,15 @@ do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned
force_sig_info_fault(SIGBUS, code, address, tsk, fault);
}

-static noinline int
+static noinline void
mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
unsigned long address, unsigned int fault)
{
- /*
- * Pagefault was interrupted by SIGKILL. We have no reason to
- * continue pagefault.
- */
- if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
- if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY))
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
- if (!(error_code & PF_USER))
- no_context(regs, error_code, address, 0, 0);
- return 1;
+ if (fatal_signal_pending(current) && !(error_code & PF_USER)) {
+ up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ no_context(regs, error_code, address, 0, 0);
+ return;
}
- if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))
- return 0;

if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM) {
/* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die: */
@@ -866,7 +858,7 @@ mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, uns
up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
no_context(regs, error_code, address,
SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR);
- return 1;
+ return;
}

up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
@@ -884,7 +876,6 @@ mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, uns
else
BUG();
}
- return 1;
}

static int spurious_fault_check(unsigned long error_code, pte_t *pte)
@@ -1193,9 +1184,17 @@ good_area:
*/
fault = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);

- if (unlikely(fault & (VM_FAULT_RETRY|VM_FAULT_ERROR))) {
- if (mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, fault))
- return;
+ /*
+ * If we need to retry but a fatal signal is pending, handle the
+ * signal first. We do not need to release the mmap_sem because it
+ * would already be released in __lock_page_or_retry in mm/filemap.c.
+ */
+ if (unlikely((fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) && fatal_signal_pending(current)))
+ return;
+
+ if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
+ mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, fault);
+ return;
}

/*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/