i40e/i40e_ethtool.c weirdness?

[Valdis Kletnieks]

(spotted while looking at a 'git bisect visualize' for something else)

After this commit:

Author: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx>  2014-09-13 03:40:47
Committer: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>  2014-10-23 23:38:04

    i40e: Add 10GBaseT support

    Add driver support for 10GBaseT device.

we have the following chunk of code in i40e_ethtool.c:

        case I40E_PHY_TYPE_10GBASE_SFPP_CU:
                ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_10000baseT_Full;
                break;
        case I40E_PHY_TYPE_1000BASE_KX:
        case I40E_PHY_TYPE_1000BASE_T:
                ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_Autoneg |
                                  SUPPORTED_10000baseT_Full |
                                  SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full |
                                  SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full;
                ecmd->advertising = ADVERTISED_Autoneg |
                                    ADVERTISED_10000baseT_Full |
                                    ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
                                    ADVERTISED_100baseT_Full;
                break;
        case I40E_PHY_TYPE_100BASE_TX:
                ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_Autoneg |
                                  SUPPORTED_10000baseT_Full |
                                  SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full |
                                  SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full;
                ecmd->advertising = ADVERTISED_Autoneg |
                                    ADVERTISED_10000baseT_Full |
                                    ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
                                    ADVERTISED_100baseT_Full;
                break;
        case I40E_PHY_TYPE_SGMII:
                ecmd->supported = SUPPORTED_Autoneg |

I'm confused by the fact that 2 cases that by name are 100M and 1G parts
got bits saying that 10G is "supported" - was that intentional?

Attachment: pgpIGsZoKDz1X.pgp
Description: PGP signature