Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Nov 20 2014 - 18:39:28 EST
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:08:03PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > So, for now, all we need is adding nmi check in percpu accessors,
> > right?
> >
>
> What's the issue with nmi? Page faults are supposed to nest correctly
> inside nmi, right?
Thought they couldn't. Looking at the trace that Frederic linked, it
looks like straight-out tracing function recursion due to an
unexpected fault while holding a lock. I don't think this can be
annotated from percpu accessor side. There's nothing special about
the context. :(
Does this matter for anybody other than tracers? Ultimately, the
solution would be removing the vmalloc area faulting as Thomas
suggested.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/