Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free"
From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Fri Nov 21 2014 - 07:22:00 EST
> ring_free does not check for null:
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c#L398
>
> Maybe your software confuses the method with:
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c#L268
Thanks for your feedback.
I am sorry for a bit of confusion here.
1. Would it make sense that a variant for the thunderbolt ring_free()
function will also perform input parameter validation?
2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space
conflicts can be better avoided?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/