Re: [PATCHv3 2/3] kernel: add support for live patching

[Seth Jennings]

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 06:35:47PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/21/2014, 05:40 PM, Seth Jennings wrote:
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> ...
> >>> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_LIVEPATCH_H
> >>> +#define _ASM_X86_LIVEPATCH_H
> >>> +
> >>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVE_PATCHING
> >>> +extern int klp_write_module_reloc(struct module *mod, unsigned long type,
> >>> +				  unsigned long loc, unsigned long value);
> >>> +
> >>> +#else
> >>> +static int klp_write_module_reloc(struct module *mod, unsigned long type,
> >>
> >> static inline?
> > 
> > I think the practice is to let the compiler handle inline determination
> > unless you are sure that the compiler isn't inlining something you think
> > it should.
> 
> Although you are right, it is a correct C, gcc specs (6.39) suggests to
> use 'static inline' on such functions. gcc then shall inline such functions.

Fair enough.  Queued up.

Thanks,
Seth

> 
> And if you look around in the kernel, we use that combination almost
> everywhere.
> 
> thanks,
> -- 
> js
> suse labs
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/