Re: [PATCH] ipc,sem block sem_lock on sma->lock during sma initialization

[Rik van Riel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/21/2014 03:09 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:52:26 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> When manipulating just one semaphore with semop, sem_lock only
>> takes that single semaphore's lock. This creates a problem during
>> initialization of the semaphore array, when the data structures
>> used by sem_lock have not been set up yet. The sma->lock is
>> already held by newary, and we just have to make sure everything
>> else waits on that lock during initialization.
>> 
>> Luckily it is easy to make sem_lock wait on the sma->lock, by
>> pretending there is a complex operation in progress while the sma
>> is being initialized.
>> 
>> The newary function already zeroes sma->complex_count before
>> unlocking the sma->lock.
> 
> What are the runtime effects of the bug?
> 

NULL pointer dereference in spin_lock from sem_lock,
if it is called before sma->sem_base has been pointed
somewhere valid.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUb6CnAAoJEM553pKExN6Dh8oH/iFVqwrukMkZp7ViFTC84DVK
m8rw6CWk76kEvi6BWx977nT26e7ZfiOCxrhyy/gETOnUDJMgQrn7cFMFd6Ja/2yG
uGCq5WcvVLDiLw7ij9Rqu4C6aHcICserzgfXwWV0XAa5TZOEqvg6FKZgCUHN6sxM
ek0TV0oq/VQvRwAQk/MFDOv38PydH2LH1Z3wXk7JVlhEMX062a4EoxTAe8Teed2p
X5+mTOl4jezog2rFJxFe0Cp8PxpqAi4f1kDugQKohZ3TpUFqH4VKZYmTtvHvpNDH
oeHjnRv632N8KuU2lvIi7EGJGu0Y+ReyOr+NQtozlRYCTPuY/rezkbBmgVwu4iY=
=CDvy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/