Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Sun Nov 23 2014 - 05:46:53 EST


On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:16:28PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:52:54 +0530
> >
> > > - Accept maximum number of queues as sysctl param so that any user space
> > > application like libvirt can use this value to limit number of queues. Also
> > > Administrators can specify maximum number of queues by updating this sysctl
> > > entry.
> >
> > This is the only part I don't like.
> >
> > Just let whoever has privileges to configure the tun device shoot
> > themselves in the foot if they want to by configuring "too many"
> > queues.
> >
> > If the virtual entity runs itself out of resources by doing something
> > stupid, it's purely their problem.
>
> Well it will run host out of kernel, no?


To clarify:

At the moment attaching/detaching queues is an unpriveledged operation.

Shouldn't we worry that an application can cause large
allocations, and provide a way to limit these?

David, could you comment on this please?

> --
> MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/