Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Mon Nov 24 2014 - 03:03:24 EST
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:23:21PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:30:32 +0200
>
> > qemu runs in the host, but it's unpriveledged: it gets
> > passed tun FDs by a priveledged daemon, and it only
> > has the rights to some operations,
> > in particular to attach and detach queues.
> >
> > The assumption always was that this operation is safe
> > and can't make kernel run out of resources.
>
> This creates a rather rediculous situation in my opinion.
>
> Configuring a network device is a privileged operation, the daemon
> should be setting this thing up.
>
> In no other context would we have to worry about something like this.
Right. Jason corrected me. I got it wrong:
what qemu does is TUNSETQUEUE and that needs to get a queue
that's already initialized by the daemon.
To create new queues daemon calls TUNSETIFF,
and that already can be used to create new devices,
so it's a priveledged operation.
This means it's safe to just drop the restriction,
exactly as you suggested originally.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/