Re: [PATCH] mm, gfp: escalatedly define GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Jianyu Zhan wrote:

> GFP_USER, GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE are escalatedly
> confined defined, also implied by their names:
> 
> GFP_USER                                  = GFP_USER
> GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM                  = GFP_HIGHUSER
> GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM + __GFP_MOVABLE  = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
> 
> So just make GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE escalatedly defined
> to reflect this fact. It also makes the definition clear and texturally
> warn on any furture break-up of this escalated relastionship.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <jianyu.zhan@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/