Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: get/put around clearing needs_remote_wakeup

[Oliver Neukum]

On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 16:56 -0800, Benson Leung wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > But there is very little to be gained by switching off remote wakeup.
> > The additional energy consumption devices with remote wakeup enabled
> > will be dwarfed by the energy needed for an additional wakeup.
> >
> 
> That makes sense to me. Does this mean we should be moving toward a
> solution that doesn't wake suspended devices on close for other usb
> devices, not just hid?
> 
> This particular pattern of get()/needs_remote_wakeup=0/put() on
> close() appears in several other drivers, for example :
> 62ecae0 Input: wacom - properly enable runtime PM
> 5d9efc5 Input: usbtouchscreen - implement runtime power management

Yes, we should never wake up a device just to unset remote
wakeup for runtime PM. In hindsight those patches were clumsy.

	Regards
		Oliver


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/