Re: [PATCH V2 02/22] perf evlist: Add initial support for mmapping an Instruction Trace buffer

[Jiri Olsa]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:23:08PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:

SNIP

> +			bool per_cpu __maybe_unused)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  static void __perf_evlist__munmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx)
>  {
>  	if (evlist->mmap[idx].base != NULL) {
> @@ -731,6 +759,7 @@ static void __perf_evlist__munmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx)
>  		evlist->mmap[idx].base = NULL;
>  		evlist->mmap[idx].refcnt = 0;
>  	}
> +	itrace_mmap__munmap(&evlist->mmap[idx].itrace_mmap);
>  }
>  
>  void perf_evlist__munmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> @@ -758,6 +787,7 @@ static int perf_evlist__alloc_mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>  struct mmap_params {
>  	int prot;
>  	int mask;
> +	struct itrace_mmap_params itrace_mp;
>  };
>  
>  static int __perf_evlist__mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx,
> @@ -788,6 +818,10 @@ static int __perf_evlist__mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx,
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (itrace_mmap__mmap(&evlist->mmap[idx].itrace_mmap,
> +			      &mp->itrace_mp, evlist->mmap[idx].base, fd))
> +		return -1;
> +

so the itrace mmap is mmaped with right after event mmap for event fd..?
is there any latest version of kernel changes, so I could check with
kernel's perf_mmap? hum.. or you just use the same mmap?

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/