Re: [PATCH 3.18-rc3 v9 1/5] irqchip: gic: Finer grain locking for gic_raise_softirq

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Marc Zyngier wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 25/11/14 17:26, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > irq_controller_lock is used for multiple purposes within the gic driver.
> > Primarily it is used to make register read-modify-write sequences atomic.
> > It is also used by gic_raise_softirq() in order that the big.LITTLE
> > migration logic can figure out when it is safe to migrate interrupts
> > between physical cores.
> > 
> > The second usage of irq_controller_lock is difficult to discern when
> > reviewing the code because the migration itself takes place outside
> > the lock.
> > 
> > This patch makes the second usage more explicit by splitting it out into
> > a separate lock and providing better comments.
> 
> While we're at it, how about an additional patch that would make this
> lock disappear entirely when the big-little stuff is not compiled in,
> which is likely to be the case on a lot of (dare I say most?) systems?
> That will save expensive barriers that we definitely could do without.

For the record, I reviewed and ACKed a patch doing exactly that a while 
ago:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/13/486

As far as I can see, no follo-ups happened.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/