Re: [PATCH 1/5] hwmon: ina2xx: bail-out from ina2xx_probe() in case of configuration errors

[Guenter Roeck]

On 11/25/2014 10:30 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/25/2014 10:22 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > 2014-11-25 18:59 GMT+01:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > It seems to me this is a problem of your architecture. That doesn't
> > > make it a generic problem. Your architecture should detect that a
> > > probe was disconnected and de-instantiate the device automatically
> > > if so, and re-instantiate it if it is re-inserted. Ultimately this
> > > should be done with, for example, devicetree overlays.
> >
> > You're right and it's planned to be done this way in the future, when
> > this project exits its prototype phase (around Q2 2015). Nevertheless
> > I still think that if we're adding a set function, it should behave
> > like the getters and check the value returned by
> > i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped().
>
> I do not question that. I question changing the return value to -ENODEV.
>
> Repeating my earlier question: Is the resistor value changed by software
> or by changing the probe ?

Looking into the available documents, I am quite sure that the resistor
is changed by replacing the probe, in other words by pulling the board
with the ina226 and replacing it with another one. Given that, configuring
the shunt resistor value with a sysfs attribute is really the wrong way
to do it; you should use probe specific devicetree overlays instead.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/