Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] kernel tinification: optionally compile out splice family of syscalls (splice, vmsplice, tee and sendfile)

From: One Thousand Gnomes
Date: Wed Nov 26 2014 - 07:24:54 EST


On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:04:41 -0500 (EST)
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:53:10 -0800
>
> > It's not a "slippery slope"; it's been our standard practice for ages.
>
> We've never put an entire class of generic system calls behind
> a config option.

Try running an original MCC Linux binary and C lib on a current kernel

We've put *entire binary formats* behind a config option. We've put older
syscalls behind it, we've put sysfs behind it, sysctl behind it, the
older microcode interfaces behind it, ISA bus as a concept behind
options. VDSO, IPC, even 32bit support ... the list goes on and on.

I'd say those were far more generic on the whole than splice/sendfile.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/