Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko StÃbner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
facilitate the integration.
Olof, is it this patch you were worried about ?
I think this is one of two patches in question.
"clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers when requested"
[0] would be the second one.
And the patch for arm-soc that Olof means would be "ARM: dts: rk3288: add
arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" [1].
Ok, so IIUC, "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers
when requested" should go via arm's tree, right ?
If I'm reading Olof's irc-comments from yesterday correctly, that is right and
the 3 patches should go in together:
- "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers
when requested" fixes the use of physical timers in general
- "clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized
timer registers" allows this to be set from dt
- "ARM: dts: rk3288: add arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" enables this on
rk3288