Re: [PATCHv4 2/3] kernel: add support for live patching

[Josh Poimboeuf]

Hi Miroslav,

Just addressing one of your comments below.  I'll let Seth respond to
the others :-)

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:19:17PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * struct klp_func - function structure for live patching
> > + * @old_name:	name of the function to be patched
> > + * @new_func:	pointer to the patched function code
> > + * @old_addr:	a hint conveying at what address the old function
> > + *		can be found (optional, vmlinux patches only)
> > + */
> > +struct klp_func {
> > +	/* external */
> > +	const char *old_name;
> > +	void *new_func;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The old_addr field is optional and can be used to resolve
> > +	 * duplicate symbol names in the vmlinux object.  If this
> > +	 * information is not present, the symbol is located by name
> > +	 * with kallsyms. If the name is not unique and old_addr is
> > +	 * not provided, the patch application fails as there is no
> > +	 * way to resolve the ambiguity.
> > +	 */
> > +	unsigned long old_addr;
> 
> I wonder if we really need old_addr as an external field. I assume that 
> userspace tool in kpatch use it as a "hint" for kernel part and thus 
> kallsyms is not needed there (and it solves ambiguity problem as well). 
> But I am not sure if it is gonna be the same in upstream. When kernel is 
> randomized (CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is set to 'y', though default is 'n') 
> old_addr is not usable (and we throw it away in the code). Without 
> old_addr being set by the user we could spare some of code (calls to 
> klp_verify_vmlinux_symbol and such). 

Even with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE, the function offsets will be the same
regardless of the base address.  So we could still use old_addr to
determine the offset.

> So the question is whether future userspace tool in upstream would need it 
> and would use it. Please note that I do not mean it as a kpatch or kgraft 
> way to do things, I'm just not sure about old_addr being "public" and want 
> do discuss the options.
> 
> The ambiguity of symbols was discussed in some other thread in lkml in 
> october (I guess) with no conclusion IIRC...

We need to resolve ambiguity somehow, and old_addr is a way to do that.
Do you have any other ideas?

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/